Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: embarqmail?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #6
    Matt's Avatar
    Matt is offline GlowHost Administrator
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Behind your monitor
    Posts
    6,389

    Default

    The best thing to do would be to complain to the embarq postmaster and tell them that they are rejecting mail from the null sender <> which makes their email systems non-RFC compliant.

    We only accept mail from RFC compliant mailservers in attempts to curb spam delivery. I am not sure why some ISPs think they are immune to the RFC's but I have seen a few that think they are not required to follow the RFCs for one reason or another...

    Per RFC 1123

    5.2.9 Command Syntax: RFC-821 Section 4.1.2

    The syntax shown in RFC-821 for the MAIL FROM: command omits
    the case of an empty path: "MAIL FROM: <>" (see RFC-821 Page
    15). An empty reverse path MUST be supported.

    The specifics can be found in the SMTP RFC which is RFC 821
    http://rfc.net/rfc821.html

    On a side note, you can allow mail from these types of mail servers if you have a dedicated server but I don't advise it since you will see about a 50&#37; increase in the volume of spam that gets delivered because of it.
    Last edited by Matt; 09-07-2007 at 02:04 PM.
    Send your friends and site visitors to GlowHost and get $125 plus bonus!
    GlowHost Affiliate Program | Read our Blog | Follow us on X |

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14